<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#039;s high time for real-time community engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gravitymedium.com/2008/03/24/its-high-time-for-real-time-community-engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2008/03/24/its-high-time-for-real-time-community-engagement/</link>
	<description>opinions on media, business, publics, government, and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Paterson</title>
		<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2008/03/24/its-high-time-for-real-time-community-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Paterson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitymedium.com/2008/03/24/its-high-time-for-real-time-community-engagement/#comment-782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yessss the &quot;precious!&quot; = the 3 c&#039;s = the best value]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yessss the &#8220;precious!&#8221; = the 3 c&#8217;s = the best value</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Proffitt</title>
		<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2008/03/24/its-high-time-for-real-time-community-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Proffitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitymedium.com/2008/03/24/its-high-time-for-real-time-community-engagement/#comment-781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m thinking about the three C&#039;s this way...

Content = negligible value (sometimes positive, sometimes neutral, sometimes negative)

Content + Context = Value
* We share a content experience in a way that&#039;s meaningful to us, to our community. It might be content that&#039;s of interest to a community gathered around that topic, or it might be content that&#039;s relevant to a geographical community, etc.

Content + Contact = Value
* We share a content experience in the same space (physical or virtual) and talk about it, react together, share.

Content + Context + Contact = Extreme Value
* This is where the True Fans phenomenon appears -- we share content, we share contact, and we have a shared context of meaning and experience. This is what Seth Godin calls the &quot;tribe.&quot;

To relate this to the presidential campaign, I think Clinton started out in a Content mode -- I have these ideas, these policies, I have this track record. Obama started out with Context -- I feel we&#039;re on the wrong track, we&#039;re not focusing on the deeper issues, we&#039;re not talking to one another, we&#039;re talking past one another, do you feel the same way?

Perhaps this is why Obama&#039;s message continues to resonate -- he&#039;s getting at something deeper than policy ideas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking about the three C&#8217;s this way&#8230;</p>
<p>Content = negligible value (sometimes positive, sometimes neutral, sometimes negative)</p>
<p>Content + Context = Value<br />
* We share a content experience in a way that&#8217;s meaningful to us, to our community. It might be content that&#8217;s of interest to a community gathered around that topic, or it might be content that&#8217;s relevant to a geographical community, etc.</p>
<p>Content + Contact = Value<br />
* We share a content experience in the same space (physical or virtual) and talk about it, react together, share.</p>
<p>Content + Context + Contact = Extreme Value<br />
* This is where the True Fans phenomenon appears &#8212; we share content, we share contact, and we have a shared context of meaning and experience. This is what Seth Godin calls the &#8220;tribe.&#8221;</p>
<p>To relate this to the presidential campaign, I think Clinton started out in a Content mode &#8212; I have these ideas, these policies, I have this track record. Obama started out with Context &#8212; I feel we&#8217;re on the wrong track, we&#8217;re not focusing on the deeper issues, we&#8217;re not talking to one another, we&#8217;re talking past one another, do you feel the same way?</p>
<p>Perhaps this is why Obama&#8217;s message continues to resonate &#8212; he&#8217;s getting at something deeper than policy ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Paterson</title>
		<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2008/03/24/its-high-time-for-real-time-community-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Paterson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitymedium.com/2008/03/24/its-high-time-for-real-time-community-engagement/#comment-780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John I love the addition of the word Context - I think that how most news is presented today makes us all more confused. Again because it is so easy to offer a headline - headlines become noise.

Darfur and Kenya are linked but not in headlines. Understanding why so many states don&#039;t work anymore is key but simply reporting that this outrage has happened and then that one - makes it all worse

Clinton is up in the polls and now Obama makes us more confused - what is the values split that is widening in America that means that the two sides can&#039;t even hear each other. Are we on track for the same kind of split as the last time that America polarized in the 1850&#039;s? That is the context - that is what makes the choices more clear - we can all go on.

Headline news is an arms race that pub radio/TV cannot win. But commercial radio/tv is not able to do context - they can&#039;t do contact either

The great TV on PBS is surely context? I saw the bio of Eleanor Roosevelt yesterday - add this to Obama and we see how race still is so divisive - then we might ask WHY rather than merely blame. That gives us a chance of converting Context to Contact. Again - we can do this and THEY can&#039;t]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John I love the addition of the word Context &#8211; I think that how most news is presented today makes us all more confused. Again because it is so easy to offer a headline &#8211; headlines become noise.</p>
<p>Darfur and Kenya are linked but not in headlines. Understanding why so many states don&#8217;t work anymore is key but simply reporting that this outrage has happened and then that one &#8211; makes it all worse</p>
<p>Clinton is up in the polls and now Obama makes us more confused &#8211; what is the values split that is widening in America that means that the two sides can&#8217;t even hear each other. Are we on track for the same kind of split as the last time that America polarized in the 1850&#8242;s? That is the context &#8211; that is what makes the choices more clear &#8211; we can all go on.</p>
<p>Headline news is an arms race that pub radio/TV cannot win. But commercial radio/tv is not able to do context &#8211; they can&#8217;t do contact either</p>
<p>The great TV on PBS is surely context? I saw the bio of Eleanor Roosevelt yesterday &#8211; add this to Obama and we see how race still is so divisive &#8211; then we might ask WHY rather than merely blame. That gives us a chance of converting Context to Contact. Again &#8211; we can do this and THEY can&#8217;t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

