<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If &#8216;newspapers&#8217; can die, then &#8216;public broadcasting&#8217; can die, too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gravitymedium.com/2008/04/10/if-newspapers-can-die-then-public-broadcasting-can-die-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2008/04/10/if-newspapers-can-die-then-public-broadcasting-can-die-too/</link>
	<description>exploring laws of attraction for public media 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:26:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2008/04/10/if-newspapers-can-die-then-public-broadcasting-can-die-too/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitymedium.com/?p=94#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Thanks, John.  I had read the Niles piece before and saved it for future reference as we here at &#039;HYY try to map out how we&#039;re going to make ourselves relevant for the Greater Philadelphia &quot;community.&quot;  Gotta admit I hadn&#039;t come acros Robert Paterson (I just started really thinking about this stuff) so thanks for the tip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, John.  I had read the Niles piece before and saved it for future reference as we here at &#8216;HYY try to map out how we&#8217;re going to make ourselves relevant for the Greater Philadelphia &#8220;community.&#8221;  Gotta admit I hadn&#8217;t come acros Robert Paterson (I just started really thinking about this stuff) so thanks for the tip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Proffitt</title>
		<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2008/04/10/if-newspapers-can-die-then-public-broadcasting-can-die-too/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>John Proffitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitymedium.com/?p=94#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Dan -- thanks for the comment.  I actually think a station that has a low percentage of CPB revenue is in a much better position.  Because you can use that 10%, say, to fund traditional broadcasting operations and development.  The other 90% is theoretically free to do whatever you want, right?  Well, sort of.

The less you&#039;re beholden to the &quot;B&quot; in CPB, the more freedom you have to do public media or new media or social media or whatever you want to call it.

Of course, a lot of this talk is theoretical and forward-looking. The reality is that Broadcasting brings in the most money for now and, for as long as mass media models hold sway, will dominate our operations. But I still see a day when that will fundamentally fall apart.

I have to say, as much as I love public media, I barely listen to radio or watch TV -- public or otherwise -- anymore. I get my news online (thus breaking my dependence on NPR) and find social media much more rewarding than mass media.  I&#039;m not typical, of course, but what if social media adherents -- like Robert Paterson -- are simply at the leading edge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan &#8212; thanks for the comment.  I actually think a station that has a low percentage of CPB revenue is in a much better position.  Because you can use that 10%, say, to fund traditional broadcasting operations and development.  The other 90% is theoretically free to do whatever you want, right?  Well, sort of.</p>
<p>The less you&#8217;re beholden to the &#8220;B&#8221; in CPB, the more freedom you have to do public media or new media or social media or whatever you want to call it.</p>
<p>Of course, a lot of this talk is theoretical and forward-looking. The reality is that Broadcasting brings in the most money for now and, for as long as mass media models hold sway, will dominate our operations. But I still see a day when that will fundamentally fall apart.</p>
<p>I have to say, as much as I love public media, I barely listen to radio or watch TV &#8212; public or otherwise &#8212; anymore. I get my news online (thus breaking my dependence on NPR) and find social media much more rewarding than mass media.  I&#8217;m not typical, of course, but what if social media adherents &#8212; like Robert Paterson &#8212; are simply at the leading edge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2008/04/10/if-newspapers-can-die-then-public-broadcasting-can-die-too/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitymedium.com/?p=94#comment-152</guid>
		<description>And what about stations for whom federal funding, while important, is less than 10% of overall revenue?  Can a local philanthropic or member base support these initiatives or is it necessary for some sort of for-profit/non-profit hybrid.

It seems like a real Catch-22, or chicken-egg problem.  We want to transform to be more engaging of the community which, in turn, could naturally lead to more community buy-in in the form of membership dollars to sustain the journalism and interaction.  BUT we need the community &quot;buy-in&quot; (literally) to provide the funding to get it started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what about stations for whom federal funding, while important, is less than 10% of overall revenue?  Can a local philanthropic or member base support these initiatives or is it necessary for some sort of for-profit/non-profit hybrid.</p>
<p>It seems like a real Catch-22, or chicken-egg problem.  We want to transform to be more engaging of the community which, in turn, could naturally lead to more community buy-in in the form of membership dollars to sustain the journalism and interaction.  BUT we need the community &#8220;buy-in&#8221; (literally) to provide the funding to get it started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
