<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcasting tools guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gravitymedium.com/2009/10/21/podcasting-tools-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2009/10/21/podcasting-tools-guide/</link>
	<description>opinions on media, business, publics, government, and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Proffitt</title>
		<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2009/10/21/podcasting-tools-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Proffitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitymedium.com/?p=736#comment-1000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It depends on &lt;strong&gt;which&lt;/strong&gt; tools you&#039;re talking about and what you consider to be &quot;prosumer.&quot; Some of the devices noted in the Hivelogic article are already used in professional public radio production (notably the Heil microphone and several of the M-Audio devices, not to mention the software tools).

Really, once you have a good microphone and can capture it digitally at 44.1KHz or higher, you&#039;re good to go to make professional audio. From there it&#039;s down to your own personal abilities to record audio, which requires knowing your tools and paying attention to the recording environment.

Each level of tool noted, as you make your way up the scale, makes for better and better audio under a greater and greater range of conditions.  But if you know your tools and how to use them, you can make awesome audio with some darn cheap tools these days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on <strong>which</strong> tools you&#8217;re talking about and what you consider to be &#8220;prosumer.&#8221; Some of the devices noted in the Hivelogic article are already used in professional public radio production (notably the Heil microphone and several of the M-Audio devices, not to mention the software tools).</p>
<p>Really, once you have a good microphone and can capture it digitally at 44.1KHz or higher, you&#8217;re good to go to make professional audio. From there it&#8217;s down to your own personal abilities to record audio, which requires knowing your tools and paying attention to the recording environment.</p>
<p>Each level of tool noted, as you make your way up the scale, makes for better and better audio under a greater and greater range of conditions.  But if you know your tools and how to use them, you can make awesome audio with some darn cheap tools these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2009/10/21/podcasting-tools-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitymedium.com/?p=736#comment-999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John -- in your view, how close are the prosumer tools to offering broadcast studio audio quality?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8212; in your view, how close are the prosumer tools to offering broadcast studio audio quality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

