<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innovator&#039;s Dilemma in 2 minutes flat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gravitymedium.com/2009/12/09/innovators-dilemma-in-2-minutes-flat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2009/12/09/innovators-dilemma-in-2-minutes-flat/</link>
	<description>opinions on media, business, publics, government, and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Proffitt</title>
		<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2009/12/09/innovators-dilemma-in-2-minutes-flat/comment-page-1/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Proffitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitymedium.com/?p=877#comment-1005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comments, Michael.

I think what business public broadcasting is actually in is up for some debate. Information and entertainment is one possibility. But I&#039;ve heard lots of folks talk about education as a primary mission, especially when it comes to kids&#039; programming. Others, like Bill Kling in his recent paper, suggest it&#039;s information in service of democracy, specifically.  There probably isn&#039;t one mission in the system on which we can all agree.

As for competition, I think we need to stop thinking about that. Each public broadcaster (that needs to become a public service media company) needs to respond to the needs of their community or region and stop paying so much attention to what people are doing in New York, DC, Los Angeles or even at OPB in Portland. We all may take cues from CPB, NPR, PBS or major outlets like WGBH, OPB, WNET, KQED and others, but if we don&#039;t focus energy locally -- and use innovation, invention and interation -- we&#039;re going to fail separately before we fail collectively.  Or if not fail, at least fall in relevance and economic viability.

Lucky for OPB they&#039;ve figured out public service while keeping some money around for national-quality production.  Lots of public service media companies might aspire to that level of support, engagement and production, but I just hope they focus locally and match community needs to media collected, curated and produced.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, Michael.</p>
<p>I think what business public broadcasting is actually in is up for some debate. Information and entertainment is one possibility. But I&#8217;ve heard lots of folks talk about education as a primary mission, especially when it comes to kids&#8217; programming. Others, like Bill Kling in his recent paper, suggest it&#8217;s information in service of democracy, specifically.  There probably isn&#8217;t one mission in the system on which we can all agree.</p>
<p>As for competition, I think we need to stop thinking about that. Each public broadcaster (that needs to become a public service media company) needs to respond to the needs of their community or region and stop paying so much attention to what people are doing in New York, DC, Los Angeles or even at OPB in Portland. We all may take cues from CPB, NPR, PBS or major outlets like WGBH, OPB, WNET, KQED and others, but if we don&#8217;t focus energy locally &#8212; and use innovation, invention and interation &#8212; we&#8217;re going to fail separately before we fail collectively.  Or if not fail, at least fall in relevance and economic viability.</p>
<p>Lucky for OPB they&#8217;ve figured out public service while keeping some money around for national-quality production.  Lots of public service media companies might aspire to that level of support, engagement and production, but I just hope they focus locally and match community needs to media collected, curated and produced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Huntsberger</title>
		<link>http://gravitymedium.com/2009/12/09/innovators-dilemma-in-2-minutes-flat/comment-page-1/#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Huntsberger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitymedium.com/?p=877#comment-1004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good stuff here.  As for public broadcasting, it seems clear we&#039;re in the information and entertainment business.  That puts us up against some stiff competition.  I agree completely with your points about invention and innovation.  I think Oregon Public Broadcasting stacks up well on these accounts.  And iteration?  I think this comes down to system resources.  Are we willing to spread them around in order to duplicate our successes?  For that matter, are we willing to share our successes?  Walking the line between competition and cooperation has always been a big challenge.  We do our best work when we find the right balance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff here.  As for public broadcasting, it seems clear we&#8217;re in the information and entertainment business.  That puts us up against some stiff competition.  I agree completely with your points about invention and innovation.  I think Oregon Public Broadcasting stacks up well on these accounts.  And iteration?  I think this comes down to system resources.  Are we willing to spread them around in order to duplicate our successes?  For that matter, are we willing to share our successes?  Walking the line between competition and cooperation has always been a big challenge.  We do our best work when we find the right balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

